mercoledì 30 marzo 2011

Risultati esame marzo

Al link trovate i risultati degli esami Lingua inglese Appello del 29 marzo.

La  verbalizzazione è prevista per il 27 maggio  ore 10:00 - Data imprororogabile!


La docente rimane sempre disponibile per delucidazioni e assistenza nella preparazione dell'esame -

domenica 13 febbraio 2011

Risultati esame febbraio

Risultati esami 4 febbraio

La verbalizzazione è prevista per il prossimo appello - 29 marzo

lunedì 17 gennaio 2011

Risultati esame gennaio

Risultati Esame Lingua Inglese Appello del 11.01.2011


Verbalizzazione risultati idonei
4.02.2011
dalle 10:00 alle 12:00

Change Exam date

La data di appello per l'esame di lingua inglese prevista per il 1 febbraio è stata spostata al 4 febbraio 2011 ore 9:30.


Dalle ore 10:00 nello stesso giorno (4 febbraio) si procederà con la verbalizzazione dei risultati idonei appello 11 gennaio.

Grazie!

domenica 9 gennaio 2011

Key words


This video is presented by TransLegal - the world leader in Legal English

Transcript of video




Hello, I'm Robin, welcome to TransLegal's lesson of the week. And today I'm going to talk about the differences between the terms robbery, burglary, theft and larceny. All of these are takings, but they are distinguished by the means, the methods and the victims of these takings.

We will start with theft and larceny. These two words are synonymous and they refer to the simple taking of anything of value with an intent to permanently deprive the owner, that is an intent to keep whatever you've stolen. Common examples of theft and larceny are, for instance, shoplifting, taking something from a store. And there are several degrees of theft and larceny. Unlike in other crimes when we talk about first degree, second degree, third degree to explain the seriousness of the crime, usually when we talk about theft and larceny we talk about grand larceny or petty theft and the difference between a grand and a petty crime when it comes to theft and larceny is usually about five hundred American dollars depending on the jurisdiction. So, for instance, if you steal a few paperback books from a bookstore you will probably be charged with petty larceny. However, if you steal a car from an open public parking lot you will probably be charged with grand larceny, otherwise known as grand theft auto.

Now if we add another element to the taking crime, if we add the element of an unlawful entry, then you get a burglary, and unlawful entry is sometimes called breaking and entering or housebreaking, but it is also an element of a burglary and when you burgle, as you would do in British English, or burglarize a premises, it means you have entered that premises to take something or to otherwise commit another crime.


Now the last one on our list, robbery, which is often deemed to be the most serious, is a foreceable stealing from a person. This time we're adding a person. In the previous examples, we stole a car from an open parking lot, no people there. We stole books from a store, there might have been people around, but we didn't do the taking from a person. Now we are actually adding real or threatened physical force.

So, for instance, a mugging, when you hold somebody up on the street, in public, that's an example of a robbery. A purse snatching when you steal somebody's purse from their body, that's a robbery. A car-jacking when you steal a car with somebody in it, that's another example of a robbery. Or one of the most popular robberies these days, stealing a mobile phone from somebody's hand or pocket, that's also a robbery. Now the actual threat or force does not have to be real. All it needs to be is threatened or assumed by the victim. So, for instance, when I was robbed some years ago, the robber came over to me and he said 'give me your wallet and don't turn around because my friend is standing in back of you with a gun pointed at your head'. So I gave him my wallet and ran away. When I called the police and explained it they said, oh well when we catch that guy, we're going to charge him with robbery. It doesn't matter if there ever was another person there who was pointing a gun or not. What matters is that you felt threatened and you perceived that there was going to be force. So, anyway, all you have to do is be afraid that someone will use force against you to have it be a robbery.

Now just so that you know, the names of people that commit these crimes. If you commit a theft and larceny, you are a thief. If you commit a burglary, you're a burglar. If you commit a robbery, you're a robber.

Now let's hope you don't meet any of these people and I would also like to thank you for listening and make sure that you have your phones and your other personal valuables close to you in case a robber happens to come on the scene. But if you have any other questions about this lesson please feel free to leave them in the comments section below and we will respond to you. Thanks a lot.

mercoledì 22 dicembre 2010

Risultati esami

Risultati esami - Appello 20 dicembre 2010



LA VERBALIZZAZIONE per gli studenti risultanti idonei è prevista improrogabilmente per il giorno 11 gennaio dalle ore 10:00 alle ore 13:00

Nello stesso giorno possono presentarsi anche gli studenti che presentano una certificazione esterna, per il riconoscimento dei crediti attribuiti all'esame di lingua inglese.

Per chi non è riuscito a raggiungere il punteggio minimo, consiglio di saltare, at least, un appello.


Have a wonderful Christmas and a very happy New Year !!

venerdì 17 dicembre 2010

Esame dicembre_2010

Esame lingua inglese: 20 dicembre 2010


Organizzazione dell’esame

Gruppo A – (A-L)

Dalle 9:30 alle 11:00



Gruppo B – (M-Z)

Dalle 11:30 alle 13:00



Non possono esserci variazioni all’ordine stabilito. Chi fosse impossibilitato a sostenere l’esame nell’orario sopra indicato può presentarsi a gennaio, previa comunicazione al docente.


Presentarsi all’esame muniti di documento di riconoscimento

Grazie per la collaborazione!

venerdì 10 dicembre 2010

Last lesson

Exam guidelines

- Reading Comprehension  (letture introduttive dal libro di testo - unit 1 - unit 10)
- collocations
- word formation
- text cohesion (the way the text holds together)
- appropriate legal vocabulary
- prepositions
- grammar (focus on:  passive, modal verbs, present perfect (simple &continuous), simple past) 





Sample exam paper

Prepositions_Legal English

domenica 5 dicembre 2010

Lesson 06.12.2010

Reading 3 Asset protection pp 112-113 ex 25-28

Supporting material
Text analysis: Discourse markers for text cohesion pag 112 ex 28

Language Focus 114 1-4

lunedì 29 novembre 2010

Lesson 30.11.2010


Text analysis audio transcript 9.1 pag 136

Collocations - phrasal verbs - idiomatic expressions
  •  to have a considerable impact on (sth/so)
  • to have a considerable impact in (place)
  • to be seen in the context of
  • a growing concern
  • to rely on
  • to accuse someone over/of sth
  • to go up to
  • to call in
  • to have right to ..
  • the right of someone to ....
  • to take actions against ..
  • social dumping
  • wage dumping
  • collective bargaining
  • fair working conditions
  • regardless of ...



Supporting material to the Laval case

European implications of the Laval case judgment

Da Liberazione: I casi Viking e Laval dicono che la lotta va fatta in Europa


Language focus: pag 105 ex 1-3

  Unit 10 - Reading 1 Comparative Law pp 106-107 ex 1-3

List of legal systems

• Civil Law

• Common Law

• Religious Law (Muslim Law, Hindu Law, Jewish Law)

• Chinese Law

• Socialist Law



Reading 2: Course reader pp107-108 ex 4-5-6

Common Law vs Civil Law



Language Use:

Contrasting

• .... is much more detailed than ...

• A major difference between ......is....., whereas ......

• This difference in ..... can be explained by....... while ...

• On the other hand, ...

• rather than ....

• ...., it differs in its importance...

• Conversely, ....

Expressing similarity: share similarities; in both…


Homework


  • Contributo al blog: rivedere tutte le lezioni e intervenire dove non compaiono commenti in merito alla consegna dell’attività
  • Explaining, Comparing and contrastin pag. 109 ex 7-8